Frode den Raske 1646

Editor: Here we have an engraving from 1646, "Frode den Raske," depicting Frotho II. It feels rather imposing, despite the small scale and I'm struck by how the crown seems almost too big for his head. What stories do you think this piece is telling? Curator: It’s interesting you note the crown, and the term "imposing," because that's what struck me. This work exists at a fascinating intersection of power, representation, and identity. How does the engraver utilize established visual languages of royalty? Note the oval frame, the Latin inscription. Who was this image *for*, and what was its role in constructing and reinforcing notions of legitimate rule at a specific historical moment? Editor: So you're suggesting it’s more about the idea of a ruler, rather than necessarily this specific person? Curator: Precisely. Think about the context in which this was made. What were the prevailing ideas about leadership and who got to define that image? And who was being excluded in this version of power? What is emphasized, what is omitted? What can we learn about the image-making process in relation to state power and propaganda? Editor: I see what you mean, focusing on the image of a strong king, maybe regardless of who he actually was. It does prompt more questions about the era and its power structures. Curator: Yes, and these questions, if we keep digging, they will uncover how intertwined art and power actually are. A portrait is never simply a portrait. Editor: I’ll definitely remember that – portraits have hidden political implications. Thanks!