Man schreeuwt tegen een slechthorende man by Paul Gavarni

Man schreeuwt tegen een slechthorende man 1842

0:00
0:00

drawing, lithograph, pen

# 

portrait

# 

drawing

# 

lithograph

# 

caricature

# 

figuration

# 

romanticism

# 

pen

# 

genre-painting

# 

realism

Dimensions height 363 mm, width 244 mm

Curator: This is "Man Shouting at a Deaf Man" by Paul Gavarni, created around 1842. It’s a lithograph, so a print, showcasing a slice of 19th-century life with a humorous twist. Editor: It strikes me as a bit satirical. Two men, one shouting into the ear of the other, who clearly isn't hearing a thing. Given that Gavarni’s known for social commentary, what was he trying to say about society at that time? Curator: Exactly. The brilliance of Gavarni lies in his ability to capture the social absurdities of his time. In 1842, France was experiencing rapid social changes, a widening gap between different social classes, and political tensions. This print comments on communication or the lack thereof. Consider the title "Revers des Medailles"—the other side of the coin. Editor: So, it’s more than just a funny image? Is it implying that communication is failing in other aspects of French society? Curator: Precisely. Perhaps communication between social classes, or even within the government? Notice the setting. It’s a public space, and their interaction becomes a spectacle, highlighting the performative nature of social interactions. And note the man's dress and the setting. Are they communicating something about class dynamics? Editor: That’s a good point. They seem to be part of the bourgeoisie, in top hats and fine clothing. So, maybe he is satirizing their own inability to connect despite being in the same social circle? The absurdity, as you say, comes through so sharply. I'm curious, what did viewers at the time make of this? Curator: Good question. I suspect it was considered humorous social critique; people found something relatable in the challenges of communication and the posturing inherent in social life. Perhaps it still resonates today because miscommunication feels evergreen. Editor: I agree! I see a lot more in this print now than I did at first glance. Curator: Absolutely! The context in which the artwork was created and circulated really does make all the difference.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.