Letter 120 to Hedibia - Question 3: How are the discrepancies in the evangelical narratives to be accounted for? How can Matthew 28:1 be reconciled with Mark 16: 1,2? c. 15th century

Curator: Here we have a page from an anonymous text titled, "Letter 120 to Hedibia," undated but likely printed in the 16th century. It's a fascinating exploration of discrepancies within the Gospels. Editor: My first impression is how densely packed the text is, and how small the woodcut illustrations are, given the weight of the theological questions they attempt to answer. Curator: Indeed. The passage focuses on reconciling the accounts of the Resurrection in Matthew and Mark, specifically regarding when Mary Magdalene visited the tomb. It's a deep dive into biblical interpretation. Editor: Absolutely. And it's interesting how the text seems to acknowledge the contradictions rather than glossing over them. It even offers possible solutions to the "Quartia Questione." Curator: The illustrations themselves are simplistic, yet they capture the key moments: Christ emerging from the tomb, and Mary's encounter with the angels. They served as visual aids in a time when literacy was not widespread. Editor: It speaks to the ongoing human struggle to reconcile faith with reason. It highlights a continued interrogation of canonical narratives in the face of conflicting accounts. Curator: It really provides insight into the intellectual climate of the time. A willingness to question and analyze religious texts, even when dealing with sacred narratives. Editor: I agree. It's a powerful reminder that engaging with historical texts means acknowledging the complexities and contradictions they present.