Dimensions: height 183 mm, width 265 mm, height 331 mm, width 486 mm
Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain
Editor: This gelatin-silver print from 1895, titled "Opgezadeld legerpaard, en profil gezien", depicts a saddled army horse, and its photographic style gives it an austere feel. I’m curious about the ways we can look at it through a materialist lens. How can we interpret it through its production and context? Curator: The choice of gelatin-silver print as a medium is crucial. Think about its rise in popularity at this time: photography was becoming more accessible and was often used for documentation purposes. This piece likely served a specific function within the military, perhaps as a record of equipment or training. We see a clear relationship between artistic technique and practical application, which underscores that the means of art production shape the way subjects are displayed and received. Editor: So, you're saying that the material—the gelatin-silver print—isn't just a passive vehicle, but actively contributes to the photograph's meaning by grounding it in a specific technological and historical context. But what about the subject matter? Does that offer more insights? Curator: Absolutely. Consider the saddled horse itself. The production of military equipment, the labor involved in training both horse and rider, and the infrastructure required to maintain them – all this points to the material realities of power. This isn’t just an image of a horse; it is an image deeply embedded in the materiality of the military industrial complex of the late 19th century. Editor: That shifts my perspective quite a bit. It’s no longer just a portrait, but evidence of the physical labor, industrial resources, and systems of control at play in military operations. Curator: Precisely. By analyzing the materiality and means of production, we can begin to decode the complex network of social relations embedded within this seemingly simple image. Editor: This conversation has definitely broadened my view, making me see it not only as a photograph but also as an artefact of military industrial practices. Thanks for making me think.
Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.