Ring Bottle c. 1940

Editor: So, here we have Giacinto Capelli's "Ring Bottle," circa 1940, a drawing in watercolor, it seems, of a ceramic piece. There's something so charmingly simple about it, almost folk-art-ish. The neutral tones of the bottle contrasting with the vibrant blue hearts really pop. What's your take on this, Professor? Curator: Charming is the word, isn't it? It makes me think of handmade things, cozy kitchens, secrets shared over strong coffee... that kind of feeling. The watercolor medium itself lends to that softness. This image almost glows, doesn't it? Editor: It really does! But tell me more about the "folk art-ish" quality you mentioned. Is there something specific that evokes that? Curator: The bottle's simple, functional design – the ring shape itself is so utilitarian, and also decorative, but still useful. Plus, those naive heart motifs remind me of traditional craft. Then, think about the initials "M.S." What stories they might hold. Was it a personalized gift? A commemorative piece? I always think there's a certain honesty that emanates from art intended for everyday life rather than the museum. Editor: So, it’s less about high art and more about the beauty in the mundane? I never considered it that way. Curator: Exactly. Though who’s to say what’s ‘high’ or ‘low’, right? What do *you* make of that central empty space? It's quite demanding. Editor: That's a really interesting question. The emptiness kind of implies a wholeness. Curator: Absolutely. This work invites us to fill it with *our* stories. And the imperfections...that hint of human presence within what might be easily assumed as mere functionality is its success. You see, its success is because its art, or, we choose it to be. Editor: Wow, that's beautifully put. I'll never look at a humble ceramic bottle the same way again! Curator: Isn't that the best kind of art then? Changing our perspectives like that?