Schotel van theeservies c. 1784

Editor: This is a plate, "Schotel van theeservies", from around 1784, attributed to Loosdrecht. It’s earthenware, so not quite as delicate as some porcelain, but it’s incredibly charming with the simple painted floral decoration. There’s something almost understated and quaint about it, which I find so appealing! What stands out to you most when you look at this? Curator: Ah, yes, "Schotel van theeservies," or a teacup saucer. What strikes me is the gentle whisper of Rococo, wouldn't you agree? That edging of soft green, kissed by a looping golden thread, cradling those little purple blooms...It's all in such playful asymmetry! Did you know Rococo was often criticised for being frivolous, even decadent? Editor: Absolutely, there's an undeniable delicacy. Thinking of it in the context of something frivolous or decadent… it doesn't shout "luxury" to me in the same way some other pieces do. Is that maybe something to do with the earthenware? Curator: Exactly! Earthenware offers a more grounded touch. Though touched by Rococo whimsy, this little saucer retains a certain Dutch earthiness. Look how sparse those blooms are sprinkled! More like wildflowers dotting a meadow than roses bursting from a grand vase. Makes me wonder about the hands that painted those tiny petals… what were they thinking? Editor: It's easy to imagine! It's funny how something so simple can trigger so many thoughts about history, class, even personal creativity. I guess that's the real magic of art, isn’t it? Curator: Indeed, art as time travel. I leave this looking forward to my next cup!