Huizen in ondergelopen buitenwijk van Parijs gezien door kale bomen by G. Dangereux

Huizen in ondergelopen buitenwijk van Parijs gezien door kale bomen 1910 - 1911

0:00
0:00

Dimensions height 52 mm, width 60 mm

Curator: My first impression is bleak! Overwhelmingly…gray. Like looking at the world through a fogged lens. Editor: This compelling photograph by G. Dangereux, taken between 1910 and 1911, offers more than meets the eye, delving into a nuanced examination of environmental disruption. Entitled "Huizen in ondergelopen buitenwijk van Parijs gezien door kale bomen," or "Houses in a flooded suburb of Paris seen through bare trees", it captures a moment freighted with both natural beauty and the stark reality of displacement. Curator: Displacement is exactly what I’m feeling! It’s subtle, because on one hand there’s a morbid beauty to it, almost romantic... but underneath is something more sinister, especially knowing it’s a photo and thus reality. Those skeletal trees almost clawing at the sky feel emblematic of something lost, wouldn’t you say? Editor: Precisely. The photograph gains further poignancy when considering its temporal context. Paris, during this period, faced profound infrastructural challenges with rapid urbanization. I think this flood presents a tangible representation of the era’s precarious relationship with urban expansion and the costs to certain communities. The almost complete monochromatic palette—it's primarily shades of gray, verging on brown and sepia—underlines a sense of isolation. It creates a timelessness that makes it so difficult to separate from social inequity or even climate catastrophe now. Curator: The water nearly blurs the buildings away entirely. It's like…a memory of a place. The reflection of the buildings in the water is especially striking; they are quite literally, mirrored, so everything’s visually doubled… perhaps it's even referencing that period of radical cultural and technological change, a city flooded with new experience that blurs your identity! Am I going too far? Editor: Not at all. We can interpret the watery reflections of architecture, nature, and history as symbolic doubling – as you keenly observed - as indicators of lost stability and the shifting foundations of identity and societal expectations within a dramatically evolving metropolis. That sense of disorientation is key, because ultimately that is a crucial and ongoing legacy with the city, which continues to rapidly grow with dire effects today. Curator: You’ve truly re-contextualized what I saw just a minute ago… Suddenly, it's not just houses under water, it's so many more important things we should consider every time we’re thinking about rapid change. Editor: I’m just glad that together, maybe, we helped to create some food for thought!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.