Carnation by Jim Dine

Carnation 1984

0:00
0:00

print, etching

# 

print

# 

etching

# 

form

# 

line

# 

realism

Dimensions plate: 45.4 x 30.5 cm (17 7/8 x 12 in.) page size: 52 x 35.5 cm (20 1/2 x 14 in.)

Curator: Here we have Jim Dine's "Carnation" from 1984, rendered as an etching. What are your initial thoughts? Editor: Stark. Those stark lines against the etched ground create a somewhat unsettling yet beautiful composition. It almost feels like a memento mori. Curator: The decision to use etching is significant. It's a process requiring careful preparation of the plate, the deliberate action of acid biting into the metal, and the physical labor of printing. Each impression, a unique product of that industrial-feeling process. Editor: I'm drawn to the choice of carnations themselves. They've carried such varied symbolic weight throughout history, from love and devotion to warnings and even mourning. The Victorians, especially, had a language of flowers, and carnations held a prominent place within that. Curator: Indeed, and the linear style employed by Dine focuses on the construction of the flower—the mechanics of the bloom, if you will. He reduces it to essential lines. Almost blueprint-like, deconstructing what constitutes the idea of "flower." Editor: And consider the bud, presented unopened. Is it hope, potential unrealized, or perhaps even the closed-off nature of grief? The context, of course, deeply impacts this, especially thinking about Dine’s broader body of work and personal losses. Curator: Good point. Etching, as a printmaking method, enabled Dine to circulate these images widely. To make these symbols more accessible, and almost democratize the process of grief or love they can come to represent. Editor: So, it’s not merely an aesthetic exercise. By producing an etching, Dine could explore how readily such symbols are adopted and adapted by various cultures to express profound emotions, like sorrow. Curator: Precisely. The choice of etching highlights how deeply the work engages in this artistic cycle. Editor: It is a cycle. Thank you; I’ll not look at carnations in quite the same way now! Curator: Nor I. A renewed focus on production changes my experience of these symbols as well.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.