Coin of Mithradates VI, Amisos (Pontos) c. 2th century

Editor: Here we have a coin of Mithradates VI from Amisos, quite small, and worn with age. What's fascinating is how this little object speaks volumes about power and representation. What’s your take on its historical significance? Curator: Indeed. Coins weren't just currency; they were tools of propaganda. The portrait, likely Mithradates himself as Apollo, aimed to project divine authority. How do you think this imagery might have influenced public perception? Editor: It’s interesting to consider it as propaganda. I hadn’t thought about how important something so small could be for solidifying power. Curator: Precisely! Think about the distribution and circulation. Each coin, a miniature advertisement reinforcing the ruler's image and legitimacy. It’s a powerful, portable statement. Editor: That makes me think of the role of museums, how they, too, shape perceptions by what they choose to display and how they present it. Thanks for the insight! Curator: My pleasure. Considering the context in which art is created and viewed reveals so much about its enduring impact.