Straatgezicht met fietser en automobiel in Pont du Loup, op de achtergrond een viaduct by Delizy

Straatgezicht met fietser en automobiel in Pont du Loup, op de achtergrond een viaduct 1903

0:00
0:00

photography

# 

pictorialism

# 

neo-impressionism

# 

landscape

# 

photography

# 

cityscape

Dimensions: height 110 mm, width 167 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: Let's explore this photograph titled "Straatgezicht met fietser en automobiel in Pont du Loup, op de achtergrond een viaduct", or "Street scene with cyclist and automobile in Pont du Loup, with a viaduct in the background". Delizy made it in 1903. My immediate impression is one of quiet industry framed against monumental architecture. Editor: Quiet is not the first word that comes to mind. I am struck by a starker contrast – the audacious bridge juxtaposed with what appear to be leisurely activities of everyday citizens. The burgeoning industrial revolution intruding upon the idyll? Curator: Interesting perspective. Pictorialism comes to mind. The neo-impressionist brushstrokes are replaced by chemical processes, as Delizy sought to elevate photography into fine art, notice the landscape. We must remember that photographers needed to fight tooth and nail for their works to be hung on museum walls. This image offers a scene ripe with symbolic tensions. Editor: Indeed, this image functions as a visual case study. Beyond formal concerns, it is essential to ask "What are we looking at?". The very presence of the automobile hints at larger socio-economic shifts. I'm particularly interested in the figures included in the scene— the status of each. How do these details reveal the prevailing socio-economic dynamics of early twentieth-century Europe? Curator: Your comments provide fertile ground for exploring power relations at the turn of the century. However, from an intrinsic perspective, the photograph's power rests in its exquisite rendering of textures – the rough-hewn stone of the viaduct versus the polished sheen of the automobile, to see it that way would be a real accomplishment for its original goal. Editor: Of course. I concur about its technical qualities. But I cannot help but ponder— what are the politics embedded within its aesthetics? I look at that bridge and ask whose labor was used in its construction? Where did the wealth that allowed for such ambitious projects come from? Curator: Questions certainly worth raising, particularly now. On a fundamental level, analyzing this work exposes how technological progress and cultural representation are inextricably intertwined. Editor: True. And the exploration into its historical and contemporary resonances deepens the analysis. Thank you for engaging in such lively dialogue.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.