Ontploffing van het Franse schip L'Orient tijdens de Slag bij de Nijl, 1 augustus 1798 1800 - 1812
print, engraving
landscape
romanticism
19th century
history-painting
engraving
Dimensions: height 355 mm, width 458 mm
Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain
Editor: This print by William Ellis, made sometime between 1800 and 1812, depicts "The Explosion of the French Ship L'Orient at the Battle of the Nile, August 1, 1798." It's so dramatic, almost theatrical! With your historical perspective, how do you interpret this work? Curator: This image functions as potent propaganda, visually cementing British naval power in the public imagination. The 'romanticism' stylistic label is spot on here, wouldn't you say? While depicting a real historical event, it is heightened and idealized for maximum emotional impact and dissemination via print culture. Think about who commissioned and consumed such images. Editor: Absolutely. The dramatic lighting, especially around the exploding ship, amplifies the emotional impact. How much did the average person, buying this print, really know about the realities of naval warfare at the time? Curator: Probably very little beyond the headlines! These prints shaped public opinion and contributed to a sense of national pride and collective identity. Did they see it as truth or a celebration of military might that benefitted them directly? Editor: So it's less about accurate documentation and more about constructing a specific narrative around a historical event. The exploding ship becomes almost a symbol of British dominance. Do you see evidence of any pre-existing narrative influencing this image? Curator: Certainly, one needs to question why the "French ship" is given so much visual attention, at the center of a work ostensibly about "victory." Images, and institutions showing images like this, played a role in defining 'Britishness' through contrast. What, for the British public of the time, was the value of associating *that* much drama with their foe? Editor: That’s a really interesting point – that its function, on some level, served to celebrate the dramatic end of a powerful adversary. Looking at it again now, I’m thinking less about "history" and more about manufactured public image.
Comments
No comments
Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.