Copyright: Public domain
Editor: Novakivskyi's "Expressionist Saint Georges Cathedral", painted in 1930 using oil, certainly bursts with vibrant, almost chaotic energy. I am captivated by its intensity; what strikes you most about this expressive cityscape? Curator: It vibrates, doesn't it? The color just *sings*. It's more than just a landscape; it’s a feeling made visible. Notice how the Saint Georges Cathedral isn't simply depicted but *embodied* as a towering inferno of earthy brick reds – practically pulsating against the lush yet equally vibrant foliage. I wonder, can you sense how Novakivskyi isn't merely showing us what he sees, but how he *feels* the weight, the history, and perhaps even the spiritual essence of this place? Editor: I see what you mean. It's less about realism and more about emotional impact, which resonates strongly. Is it accurate to characterize it under the Expressionist art movement? Curator: Absolutely, although I detect elements of Fauvism there too. Think about Matisse's rule-breaking use of colour; how those avant-garde cats freed colour from mere descriptive duty. Novakivskyi certainly echoes this radical freedom, creating an emotionally supercharged rendition. Do you not get the sense that the painting is almost a living thing in and of itself? Editor: I definitely agree, the way colours intermingle feels lively. And you're right, looking closely I can now see echoes of Fauvism too in its boldness. Thanks for that extra nugget. Curator: Anytime! This kind of picture, if it does its job right, gets right under your skin and maybe makes you think differently. Perhaps what we call seeing is merely touching with our eyes. Editor: Definitely food for thought – seeing and feeling intertwined. A valuable perspective to ponder on, thank you.
Comments
No comments
Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.