Brief aan Mien Cambier van Nooten Possibly 1938

Editor: This is "Brief aan Mien Cambier van Nooten," possibly from 1938, by Dick Ket. It's a drawing in ink on paper currently at the Rijksmuseum. It feels intimate, like a page from a personal sketchbook, covered in elegant calligraphy, yet I can’t read a word! What meaning do you find embedded in a piece like this? Curator: Well, look closer. The script *is* the image. Think about it – the act of handwriting carries a tremendous cultural and personal weight. Each curve, each flourish, reflects a unique individual, even more so than a printed typeface. Calligraphy, even when illegible, signifies learning, refinement, perhaps even longing for a time of elegance and handwritten correspondence. Editor: So you're saying that even though we can't read it, the handwriting *itself* communicates? Curator: Precisely. It transforms language into visual art. The form echoes function, as handwriting preserves memory in script. But let’s consider something further - can you notice instances of this method anywhere else? Editor: You mean where handwriting is the art, not just conveying meaning? I am thinking street art… and graffiti where taggers use unique lettering as their signature… Curator: Excellent. This artistic choice by Dick Ket connects across eras, through both the art world and subcultures. What does the choice of script evoke for you now, considering that link? Editor: A sense of immediacy… almost rebellion maybe? Because now handwriting in the age of keyboards feels counter-cultural, intimate…even revolutionary. I would not have seen that before. Curator: Yes, but it continues and also reinvents old traditions. Symbols don't exist in a vacuum, do they? Editor: Definitely not. It’s amazing how handwriting, something so common, can hold so much meaning. Thanks for this cultural decoding!