Repeating watch 1770 - 1790

Editor: So, here we have an ornate metal pocket watch, crafted sometime between 1770 and 1790 by the Firm of Wiss Brothers. It’s currently held at the Met. The level of detail in the relief and engraving is just amazing! What strikes me most is its clear aspiration for luxury; but in what ways do the elite commission and display such a piece? Curator: It's interesting that you pick up on its inherent "luxury." These objects tell us much more about social dynamics of the period. Timepieces were transitioning from purely functional objects to statements of wealth and taste, effectively signalling the wearer’s place within the socio-economic hierarchy. What aspects of its design do you think would reinforce this message of wealth? Editor: I guess the ornamental flourishes like the floral motifs, leaves, and intricate engravings…it's so extra, you know? Would something like this have been intended more as art than as, like, a tool? Curator: That's a good question. The rise of decorative arts reflects a blurring between functionality and aesthetics. Owning such a piece positioned individuals as cultured patrons, invested in craftsmanship and display. Can we, then, consider the watch’s creator too? Editor: So, commissioning such an ornate object like this suggests that elite collectors helped dictate an artist’s role? Almost that their work exists because the elite want beautiful things? Curator: Precisely! These status objects acted as powerful signifiers and also preserved those social classes through cultural visibility. This particular piece allowed patrons to show they understand visual codes but at what cost to everyone else? Editor: Wow, it’s amazing to consider how even a seemingly small object like this holds such social weight. Thank you for illuminating how such objects play into a complex social arena. Curator: My pleasure. Looking at objects through that historical lens always offers valuable new perspectives.