Borghese vaas c. 1650

Editor: This engraving is called "Borghese Vase," created around 1650 by Georges Tournier. It's quite detailed, capturing the form of the vase beautifully. The figures feel frozen, classical. What’s your take on it? Curator: The "Borghese Vase" is a fascinating artifact, even in this reproduced form. Consider the social context of its creation and circulation through prints. Who had access to images like these in the 17th century, and what power did that access confer? Editor: So, access meant power? Curator: Precisely! The engraving translates a sculpture—a luxury object—into a more accessible form. But even prints catered to a specific, educated elite. Think about the vase itself: a pastiche of classical imagery. Whose stories are being told here, and whose are being erased? Consider how the appropriation of classical forms has historically reinforced certain hierarchies and excluded marginalized voices. How do we reconcile that with the beauty or skill evident in the work? Editor: It’s a beautiful object, I see the classical allusions you're talking about but what you're pointing out complicates things for me. I never thought of it like that. Curator: The aim is not to diminish the aesthetic value, but to enrich our understanding by recognizing the power dynamics at play. Even in a seemingly benign image, history whispers—or sometimes shouts, depending on who's listening. The uncritical enjoyment of this piece allows existing systems to repeat themselves in new eras. Editor: Wow. That makes me think about how classical imagery continues to be used today, and what messages it carries. Thanks, this was really helpful to get another, fuller perspective on it. Curator: Exactly, this reflection makes our consideration a more complex, richer viewing experience.