Afstand van Karel V ten behoeve van Filips II 1555

Editor: This piece, titled "Afstand van Karel V ten behoeve van Filips II," dating from 1555, appears to be a metal sculpture by Jacques Jonghelinck. It has a coin-like shape with portraits in profile. The texture and the craftsmanship look incredibly detailed. What do you see when you look at this work? Curator: Well, first, consider the material itself: metal. Metal endures; it signifies permanence and power. In this context, Jonghelinck's choice elevates these portraits beyond mere representation. They become testaments to power, carefully manufactured commodities meant to circulate. Editor: So, the value lies in the metal as a symbol, and its physical form of commodity and not in the image represented on the surface? Curator: Exactly. Consider also that this piece commemorates a very specific political act: Charles V abdicating in favor of Philip II. The act itself is a transfer of power, of resources, of means of production. This sculpture serves as material record. Was it commissioned or created as propaganda? It probably served both purposes. What I would love to examine is the supply chain, and working conditions for artisans like Jonghelinck at the time this was made. Editor: It’s interesting to consider this as a manufactured item rather than just a sculpture of important historical figures. Looking at it that way gives me a totally new way to think about this work. Curator: Absolutely! Seeing art through a material lens encourages us to question who profits, who labors, and how the very materials shape meaning and reception. Editor: Thanks! I’ve certainly gained a broader perspective on how to approach historical art like this. Curator: It was my pleasure. Now you have a material understanding.