Seery, Left Field, Indianapolis, from the Old Judge series (N172) for Old Judge Cigarettes by Goodwin & Company

Seery, Left Field, Indianapolis, from the Old Judge series (N172) for Old Judge Cigarettes 1887

drawing, print, photography

# 

portrait

# 

drawing

# 

print

# 

baseball

# 

photography

# 

historical photography

# 

men

Editor: So, this is "Seery, Left Field, Indianapolis," a photograph from the Old Judge series made in 1887. It's a small portrait of a baseball player. It seems pretty straightforward, but something about the sepia tone and the composition makes it feel posed and a bit stiff. What do you make of it? Curator: Initially, one observes the stark contrast inherent within the photographic print itself. Note how the subject, illuminated against a comparatively darker backdrop, generates a clear figure-ground relationship. Observe the formal properties: the sitter is nearly symmetrical, the bat acting as a vertical counterpoint to his stance. Do you discern any disruption to this almost classical composition? Editor: I see that he’s slightly off-center, and his gaze is directed to the side. Also, there's the odd framing–it's a very tight crop of a full body shot that would feel much different if it was cropped to just his face. Curator: Precisely. These subtleties preclude a reading of mere portraiture. The interplay between light and shadow molds the figure, lending depth and volume, but also contributing to an almost theatrical staging. Does the photographic texture inform your perception? Editor: I guess so. You can almost see the texture of the paper itself. And there's not as much clarity as modern photographs, like the photo stock used gives this slightly blurred feel, almost like a dream. Does that texture affect how we read the image, too? Curator: Indeed, the texture complicates a simple mimetic reading, compelling a re-evaluation of its aesthetic properties. This photograph presents an intersection of documentation and artistic construction, highlighting the evolving relationship between the objective lens and the subjective eye of the image-maker. Editor: That's interesting. I see now that it's not just a portrait; it's carefully constructed to give the impression of both reality and art. Thank you for pointing out the ways its formality is subverted! Curator: It is in considering these elements that we discern the art, rather than merely observing a representation.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.