Portret van Jobst Wilhelm Kraus by Christoph-Wilhelm Bock

Portret van Jobst Wilhelm Kraus 1780 - 1836

0:00
0:00

print, engraving

# 

neoclacissism

# 

aged paper

# 

toned paper

# 

print

# 

old engraving style

# 

form

# 

line

# 

history-painting

# 

academic-art

# 

engraving

# 

realism

Dimensions: height 153 mm, width 96 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: This is a print of Jobst Wilhelm Kraus created between 1780 and 1836 and held here at the Rijksmuseum. What are your initial thoughts? Editor: Strikingly neoclassical. That perfectly smooth, almost idealized profile. And that tight oval frame really focuses the eye. Curator: Indeed. What's compelling is this isn’t some grand oil painting, but an engraving. This piece really blurs the line between reproductive print and original artistic creation. Editor: That's fascinating. So, the production process itself – the repetitive labor of the engraver, and the use of accessible materials like paper—influences its meaning. Is this democratization of portraiture? Curator: Precisely. The print medium makes images more widely available. It becomes a commodity within a market, driving artists to become entrepreneurial in selling and distributing their works through printmaking networks. Editor: Let's return to form, though. Observe how Christoph-Wilhelm Bock's meticulous rendering of line, particularly around the face and collar, create that distinct contrast in tonality. It projects this almost detached coolness. Curator: Yes, but note the social performance embedded in this style, though. A portrait wasn’t just about likeness, but constructing a desired identity linked to enlightenment values like clarity and reason. Kraus isn't only portrayed, he's *performed*. Editor: Still, that gaze. It demands engagement and introspection. There's a real beauty in those restrained lines. Curator: I agree, though this piece asks that we think past the artistry itself to consider social function and access, pushing the boundaries of both artistic production and reception at the time. Editor: Food for thought indeed!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.