Cup and saucer 1755 - 1765

Editor: So, this is a Meissen porcelain cup and saucer from around 1755-1765, currently held at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The decorations give it a whimsical, theatrical feel. It almost feels like it should be on display in a dollhouse. What's your read on this piece? Curator: It *is* precious, isn’t it? When I look at this cup and saucer, I imagine it resting in the manicured hand of a bewigged dandy or a silk-gowned lady, centuries ago. A world of powdered faces and whispered secrets. And you know, porcelain was almost magical back then; a closely guarded European secret and it was also frightfully expensive. That detailed genre painting adorning both pieces whispers of courtly life, little vignettes of leisure. Almost like glancing at a play within a play. I wonder, does that contrast between the mundane object and the intricate scenes strike you? Editor: I do see the contrast, it is odd! I can also see what you mean by a "play within a play"! So do you think this was primarily appreciated for its art or function at the time? Curator: Aha, there’s the rub! While it *was* functional, its primary role likely existed as a display piece – a testament to wealth, refined taste, and perhaps a subtle jab at those who *couldn't* afford such extravagance. After all, would *you* want to risk staining that intricate decoration with tea? Editor: Good point! It seems so fragile and delicate that simply looking at it may be its main function, that makes a lot of sense to me! Thanks. Curator: Exactly! It invites a slower, more deliberate appreciation, and to ponder the hidden meanings embedded in those scenes of fashionable dalliance. You know, I never looked at porcelain quite this way before.