Hill Arches by Henry Moore

Hill Arches 1963

0:00
0:00

bronze, sculpture, site-specific

# 

organic

# 

negative space

# 

sculpture

# 

bronze

# 

abstract

# 

form

# 

geometric

# 

sculpture

# 

site-specific

# 

line

# 

the-seven-and-five-society

# 

modernism

Editor: Right, next up we have Henry Moore’s “Hill Arches,” a bronze sculpture created in 1963. It has such a strong presence; it feels almost primeval in its simplicity. What do you see in this piece, what symbols or stories does it bring to mind? Curator: Immediately, the smoothness of the bronze and the interplay between solid form and negative space suggest something ancient, smoothed by time, like a weathered bone or a pebble shaped by water. The arch, of course, is a potent symbol of transition, of moving from one state to another, present across millennia of human culture. But what *kind* of transition do you imagine it symbolizing here? Editor: Maybe a transition between nature and the man-made, considering its title? I notice how the geometric shapes soften and merge with each other organically, resembling bones or natural rock formations… almost womb-like. Curator: Exactly. Moore was fascinated by natural forms, often returning to the human figure, even in his most abstract work. Consider the sphere nestled within the arches: What symbolic weight does the orb, the all-encompassing circle, carry in different cultures? Is it an eye, an egg, a world? It nests into the rest as an inseparable entity; this visual association makes one consider the nature of place. Editor: I can see it as a life-force. It all seems very interconnected now. How does its position in nature outside, surrounded by a garden, contribute? Curator: Moore deliberately placed his sculptures in the landscape to create a dialogue between art and nature. How does that interplay enrich the viewer's experience, knowing the shapes mirror shapes of landscape? Editor: It’s like the sculpture is mimicking or harmonizing with what is around it. This connection to nature is something I didn’t realize, which is why I was looking for an argument to place "man" versus "nature". Curator: Perhaps it is in this space, we can examine how inseparable both notions of nature and of man truly are, and that it can be as simple as viewing both in different arcs to approach unity. Thanks, that helped solidify my own view of this piece, in thinking of it in such binary opposition and its resolution. Editor: Yes, it makes for an engaging dialogue! Thank you!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.