drawing, watercolor
portrait
drawing
figuration
watercolor
naïve-art
watercolour illustration
watercolor
Dimensions overall: 38.4 x 27.7 cm (15 1/8 x 10 7/8 in.) Original IAD Object: 7 1/2" high
Curator: Oh, she has such a haunting stare! A paper doll, perhaps escaped from some lost fairytale? Editor: That’s an interesting read! I think it also important to introduce this work: Rex F. Bush, circa 1937, presenting "Doll - 'Martha.'" A rather striking watercolour illustration on paper. Let’s consider the naive art style… the flattened perspective. Curator: Yes, 'naive' is kind, but it is more compelling than technically proficient, no? The simplified shapes and somewhat awkward proportions, there is this captivating simplicity…almost dreamlike in how the colors bleed just so. Did the artist create their own pigment, I wonder? It looks homemade in some light. Editor: Pigment source could certainly reflect available materials during its creation. What is perhaps more intriguing to me is what it communicates about labour and childhood in the 1930s; a portrait executed as a pastime – how leisure time was then structured through such creations. Bush provides both a subject and its rendering simultaneously. A plaything, represented plainly on inexpensive stock! Curator: It certainly holds up a mirror to that specific era. Children finding creativity and ingenuity amidst scarcity, or perhaps just… escaping reality. Though something in the muted tones and Martha's placid expression suggest something quieter. Editor: I concur! Think about accessibility too; watercolors require minimum tooling relative oil paint! Mass production democratizes art; the subject rendered reflects what childhood means in concrete socio-economic terms beyond fantasy. Curator: Fair point! Even its imperfections lend a vulnerability that contrasts so sharply with say a carefully wrought oil portrait by a more classical painter, or even commercial renderings today. More so the human hand reveals process alongside its subject; brushstroke decisions present both technical acumen AND human feeling explicitly! Editor: Agreed. Seeing Bush’s mark becomes revelatory on process in the finished artefact—bringing an art-making accessibility both from our present consumption lens AND past historical context. It prompts rethinking how art materials and techniques shape perception fundamentally. Curator: Beautifully stated. Ultimately this Martha resonates due the art materials utilized coupled historical-cultural climate permeating both execution/materials within its surface's materiality specifically Editor: Ultimately, by questioning art through Bush's material conditions regarding doll manufacture processes alongside emotional undercurrent inherent at the creation of that drawing...both come together to broaden perspectives/insights of the historical art experience itself!
Comments
No comments
Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.