Still Life by Roger de La Fresnaye

Still Life 1908 - 1912

0:00
0:00

painting, oil-paint

# 

cubism

# 

painting

# 

oil-paint

# 

abstraction

# 

monochrome

Dimensions 77.5 cm (height) x 53 cm (width) (Netto)

Curator: Looking at this canvas by Roger de La Fresnaye, entitled simply, "Still Life", painted sometime between 1908 and 1912, it strikes me as a quiet, almost melancholic meditation on form. What do you think? Editor: Stark. Immediately, I sense a strong austerity. The monochrome palette really amplifies the geometric breakdown of these everyday objects, like something from a world in perpetual winter, drained of vibrancy, evoking ideas around scarcity and… almost monastic minimalism. Curator: I get that sense of austerity, definitely. But there's a playfulness there too, don’t you think? How the chair, the cloths, and other objects all but dissolve into pure shapes? The textures in those strokes almost evoke musical notes dancing. And don't forget, this was painted during a very turbulent pre-war period; I think La Fresnaye found solace in abstraction. Editor: Precisely. Pre-war Europe was ripe with social unrest, a crumbling empire mentality facing new realities. This so-called 'solace' could also be interpreted as an act of deliberate removal, an artistic avoidance, really, of the social anxieties bubbling all around him—choosing to retreat into a formal, almost sterile, exercise instead of wrestling with societal issues of the time. But I agree: he used the fractured planes of early Cubism as a stage on which a type of interior narrative could play out. Curator: True. But I still see it as incredibly innovative for its time. Breaking free from conventional representation to express something… visceral. The limited palette seems so purposeful! Did he feel this almost… forced restraint too? Editor: Oh, there’s intent, absolutely, which links directly to philosophical currents swirling through Paris then. Many felt trapped within traditional frameworks—artistic, societal, and personal. The monochrome strips away excess, demanding we confront the structural essence beneath—questioning established power dynamics perhaps through radical aesthetic form? Curator: Well said. Perhaps we see two sides of the same coin: La Fresnaye embracing and evading. An artistic reaction to a world in flux, beautifully restrained. Editor: Indeed. Its somber beauty really calls to the fore a period riddled with both possibility and profound unease, still relevant today!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.