Gedenkteken van Willem Eygaert in de Nieuwe Kerk te Amsterdam by Johan Adolph Rust

Gedenkteken van Willem Eygaert in de Nieuwe Kerk te Amsterdam 1843

0:00
0:00

drawing, watercolor, pencil

# 

drawing

# 

landscape

# 

watercolor

# 

pencil

# 

watercolour illustration

# 

history-painting

# 

academic-art

# 

watercolor

Dimensions: height 202 mm, width 208 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: This is Johan Adolph Rust's 1843 watercolor and pencil drawing, "Gedenkteken van Willem Eygaert in de Nieuwe Kerk te Amsterdam," depicting Willem Eygaert's memorial. It feels delicate but precise, almost like an architectural study. What stands out to you about this piece? Editor: It's interesting how the artist used watercolor to depict something so solid, like a stone memorial. From my perspective, Rust documented a tangible object and made it into something more ephemeral, more like memory itself. As a Materialist, what story does the making of this artwork tell you? Curator: For me, the use of watercolor, a relatively inexpensive and easily transportable medium, points to the democratizing potential of art production at this time. The memorial itself signifies power and remembrance, constructed with materials like stone and possibly bronze. Yet Rust chose to render it in watercolor, challenging the permanence implied by the memorial's own materials. Editor: That makes me wonder if it's about accessibility. Was Rust perhaps aiming to create a more accessible or democratic representation of elite memory? Curator: Precisely. Consider the social context: 1843 Amsterdam. We're witnessing the rise of a middle class, increasingly interested in art and history. By choosing accessible materials like pencil and watercolor, Rust produces an image easily reproducible, circulated as prints maybe. Think about labor of creating a grand stone monument, versus labor of drawing: Rust collapses hierarchies here. Editor: So the material choices, and the means of production become key to interpreting the artwork’s significance within a broader societal context. Curator: Exactly. And think about the consumption of art – who would have purchased or viewed this image, and how does that consumption relate to the social status of both Eygaert and Rust? Editor: That’s given me a lot to consider! It’s more than just a pretty picture. It’s an artifact of social change! Curator: Indeed. It is a fascinating intersection of material, process, and social forces!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.