George Frederick Cooke in the Role of Richard III by Thomas Sully

George Frederick Cooke in the Role of Richard III 1812

0:00
0:00

painting, oil-paint

# 

portrait

# 

painting

# 

oil-paint

# 

figuration

# 

oil painting

# 

romanticism

# 

history-painting

# 

academic-art

# 

portrait art

# 

fine art portrait

Curator: I'm immediately struck by the tension in this portrait. It's got a swagger, but something feels performative and unsteady too. Editor: You're right, there is a palpable performative quality about it. What you're seeing is Thomas Sully's oil painting, "George Frederick Cooke in the Role of Richard III" from 1812. It beautifully showcases Cooke's intensity as the villainous king. Curator: Oh, Richard III, that explains the lurking malevolence under the shiny surface. I feel as if he's about to deliver a deliciously evil monologue right at me. The costuming…all that velvet and the dramatic feather, it's fantastic. Editor: It really emphasizes theatricality through its romantic, history-painting style, doesn't it? Note the careful composition. Cooke is positioned slightly off-center, with a ghostly architectural backdrop behind him, drawing the viewer’s eye from left to right to settle finally on his captivating grimace. The gesture of the left hand creates diagonal tensions across the field. Curator: Exactly! That grimace does so much work. It feels both calculated and utterly unhinged. Is that…statue lurking behind him intentional, do you think, a kind of morality check barely visible in the background? Or a nod to Shakespearean drama perhaps? Editor: Likely so. We know Sully sought to elevate portraiture through the techniques employed in history painting; incorporating symbols, like the statue you mention, certainly underscores this pursuit. Curator: It definitely elevates things; although he's clearly the star, his gaudy wardrobe kind of overpowers the subtlety of the portrait in some ways, wouldn’t you agree? I'm conflicted because it does add to his flamboyant and unnerving presence. Editor: Perhaps, and yet it might be impossible to divorce our image of Richard III from just this kind of dramatic flair; perhaps what strikes us is an echo of collective visual memory. Curator: An intriguing idea! Regardless, the painting definitely gets under your skin. It's more than just a depiction, it's an experience. Editor: Indeed. Sully's painting really encapsulates the power of performance and persona, and still speaks vividly to modern viewers like us.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.